自由机构合同审查

Paste a management contract and we'll go through it clause by clause against 18 patterns that reliably cost creators money or control. No account, no card, and we don't store what you paste.

你粘贴没被保存 如果你还在和这个机构谈判, 你不应该留下一份他们合同的副本 给陌生人, 以便知道它是否公平。 文本是读过一次, 记忆中, 然后扔掉的。
纯文字效果最好,如果你愿意,请删除您的姓名和他们的名。

我们所寻找的

7 of these are deal-breakers — clauses that can cost you your account, your content, or money you've already earned.

为什么存在这种

寻找关于创作者管理合同的建议, 大部分回馈的东西由机构公布。 他们不会告诉你50%的佣金 需要将你的收入 翻一番才能打破平衡, 或者一个证书转让条款会将你的全部业务 交给你。

我们没有机构可以保护。这个支票存在于我们有偿产品里, 所以没有理由把它放在注册墙后面——最需要的人最不可能把电子邮件地址交给一个他们从未听说过的公司。

如何运作

A language model reads the contract and finds and quotes the relevant clauses. It does not decide how serious they are — a fixed, versioned rule pack does that, so the same clause always gets the same verdict and a model update can't silently change what we tell people. You see the exact text that triggered every flag, so you can judge it yourself.

This is an automated review to help you spot common problems — not legal advice, and not a substitute for a lawyer. We can miss things, and a clause that looks fine in isolation can still be a problem in context. Have a lawyer review anything you are about to sign.